State Farm wants suits moved from Mississippi coast

GULFPORT, MISS. - The jury pool in south Mississippi has been tainted by "media propaganda" about the insurance industry's handling of claims after Hurricane Katrina, a major insurer argues in a bid to move the trials for several lawsuits spawned by the storm.

State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. commissioned a survey of 3,600 registered voters in Mississippi that found a "substantial amount of bias against insurance companies" among Gulf Coast residents after Katrina. The Bloomington, Ill.-based insurer claims the survey demonstrates that it can't get a fair trial here for the lawsuits filed by policyholders whose homes were damaged or destroyed by last year's storm.

State Farm is asking a federal judge in Gulfport, a city devastated by Katrina, to move at least three trials more than 300 miles north to Oxford, Miss., where the survey found "much less bias" against insurance companies.

Hundreds of Gulf Coast homeowners are suing their insurance companies for refusing to cover damage from Katrina's water, including wind-driven "storm surge." State Farm is believed to be the first company seeking to move a Katrina insurance trial from one federal court to another.

Lawyers for the policyholders argue that State Farm hasn't met the legal burden for showing that the case must be moved to ensure a fair trial.

On Friday, State Farm asked U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert Walker to hear testimony from Kent Tedin, a University of Houston political science professor who designed and analyzed the survey for State Farm. Walker did not immediately rule on the request.

Tedin has designed similar public opinion surveys for several high-profile cases, including the trial of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, which was moved to Denver.

His survey for State Farm posed questions to 400 registered voters who live in the Gulfport court's jurisdiction. The survey, which was conducted by SRBI and has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percent, found that:

•54 percent said insurers should be required to pay for damage from hurricane flood waters. A federal judge in a different case already has ruled that a standard homeowner policy excludes flood damage from coverage.
•55 percent said insurance companies have been unfair in settling claims after Katrina, 19 percent said the companies have been fair, and 26 percent had no opinion.
•49 percent agreed with a remark by Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Miss., that "there ought to be a national registry of child molesters and insurance company executives, because I hold them in the same, very low esteem."

Zach Scruggs, an attorney whose firm is suing State Farm on behalf of hundreds of policyholders, said it's disingenuous for the company to complain about bad publicity while spending millions of dollars on "feel-good" television ads touting its response to Katrina.

__________________________________________

By MICHAEL KUNZELMAN
Associated Press

© 1985 - 2002 Hearst Newspapers Partnership, L.P. All rights reserved.